AMS Public Transport Holdings (HKG:77) Seems To Use Debt Quite Sensibly

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. We note that AMS Public Transport Holdings Limited (HKG:77) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.

When Is Debt Dangerous?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more common (but still painful) scenario is that it has to raise new equity capital at a low price, thus permanently diluting shareholders. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.

View our latest analysis for AMS Public Transport Holdings

What Is AMS Public Transport Holdings's Net Debt?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that AMS Public Transport Holdings had HK$149.7m of debt in March 2019, down from HK$159.4m, one year before. However, because it has a cash reserve of HK$33.9m, its net debt is less, at about HK$115.8m.

SEHK:77 Historical Debt, November 9th 2019
SEHK:77 Historical Debt, November 9th 2019

How Healthy Is AMS Public Transport Holdings's Balance Sheet?

We can see from the most recent balance sheet that AMS Public Transport Holdings had liabilities of HK$64.5m falling due within a year, and liabilities of HK$122.1m due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had HK$33.9m in cash and HK$8.33m in receivables that were due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by HK$144.4m.

This deficit is considerable relative to its market capitalization of HK$239.3m, so it does suggest shareholders should keep an eye on AMS Public Transport Holdings's use of debt. This suggests shareholders would heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.

We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). Thus we consider debt relative to earnings both with and without depreciation and amortization expenses.