Yahoo Finance

As briefly outlined on slide three, we developed Huntington strategies with a vision of creating the high-performing regional bank and delivering top quartile through-the-cycle shareholder returns. Our first quarter profitability reflects continued progress toward this aspiration. We continue to make thoughtful and meaningful long-term investments in our businesses, particularly around customer experience in order to drive organic growth. We also prudently allocate our capital to ensure we are earning adequate returns and taking appropriate risk consistent with our aggregate moderate-to-low risk appetite.

We are very pleased with how we are positioned. We've built sustainable competitive advantages in our key businesses that we believe are and will continue to deliver top quartile financial performance in the future. We remain focused on driving sustained long-term financial performance for our shareholders.

Slide four illustrates our current expectations for full-year 2019 and our new long-term financial goals. We continue to have a very constructive view of the local economies in our footprint, which we expect will translate into continued organic growth this year. What we are hearing from our customers remains positive. Businesses in our local markets generally continued to deliver good performance. While the first quarter tends to be our seasonally slowest quarter for commercial lending activity, our commercial pipelines have remained steady. Businesses in our footprint are investing in capital expenditures and expansions, while the tight labor markets continue to constrain economic growth.

Our commercial customers continue to tell us that finding employees is their biggest challenge. Some of these businesses have also weathered the headwinds of ongoing tariff and trade disputes. Across our footprint, customers also remain upbeat with strong labor markets driving wage inflation. In the three months ending February, 18 of our 20 largest footprint MSAs saw unemployment rates decline while the remaining two MSAs were unchanged. Additionally, consumer confidence in our region is generally stayed at the highest levels since 2000. Job openings continue to exceed unemployment levels in most of our markets.

So to summarize, we're saying that we remain bullish on the economy and our footprint, within our businesses. We do not see signs of near-term economic downturn, but nonetheless, we are cognizant of recent market volatility and mixed economic data, particularly in December and earlier this year as well as the recent short-lived inversion of the yield curve. As we've communicated on the last earnings call, we've removed all rate hikes from our forecast and have been taking steps to prepare for a more challenging interest rate outlook.

We do not foresee a recession in the near term; however, our core earnings power, strong capital, aggregate moderate-to-low risk appetite, and our long-term strategic alignment position us to withstand economic headwinds. Our strategy is designed to drive more consistent performance across economic cycles.

Our full-year 2019 expectations remain unchanged from what we discussed in the fourth quarter earnings call in January. We expect full-year average loan growth in the range of 4% to 6%. Full-year average deposit growth is also expected to be 4% to 6%, as we remain focused on acquiring core checking accounts and deepening customer relationships.

We expect full-year revenue growth of 4% to 7%. The full-year NIM is expected to remain relatively flat on a GAAP basis versus 2018, inclusive of the anticipated reduction in the benefit of purchase accounting and the cost of the hedging strategy we began implementing in the first quarter this year. The full-year core NIM is expected to modestly expand. Non-interest expense is expected to increase 2% to 4%. Consistent with our stated priorities, we continue to target annual positive operating leverage in 2019.

As Mac noted in the conference presentations during the first quarter, we expect our normal seasonal increase in compensation and marketing expenses during the second quarter resulting in a peak quarterly efficiency ratio for the year in the second quarter. We anticipate full-year 2019 net charge-offs will remain below our average through-the-cycle target range of 35 basis points to 55 basis points. Our expectation for the full-year effective tax rate is in the 15. 5% to 16.5% range.

So with that, Mac will now provide an overview of our financial performance. Mac? Thank you.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Steve, and good morning, everyone. Slide five provides the highlights for the 2019 first quarter. Results reflected a strong earnings momentum with double-digit growth rates in net income and earnings per common share along with continued improvement in our profitability ratios. We recorded net income of $358 million, an increase of 10% versus the year-ago quarter. We reported earnings per common share of $0.32, up 14% year-over-year. Tangible book value per common share was $7.67, an 8% year-over-year increase. Return on assets was 1.3%, return on common equity was 14%, and return on tangible common equity was 18%. Our efficiency ratio for the quarter was 55.8%, down from 56.8% in the year-ago quarter. We saw net interest margin expansion of 9 basis points to 3.39% compared to the 2018 first quarter as a result of disciplined asset and deposit pricing and the benefit of interest rate increases, partially offset by the continued runoff of purchase accounting accretion.

Turning now to slide six. Average earning assets increased $3.8 billion, or 4% compared to the year-ago quarter. Loan growth accounted for more than the entire increase as average loans and leases increased $4.3 billion, or 6%, year-over-year, including a $2.5 billion, or 7% increase in consumer loans and a $1.8 billion, or 5% increase in commercial loans. Aided by the strong loan production late in the fourth quarter, average commercial and industrial loans grew 8% from the first quarter of 2018 and reflected the largest component of our year-over-year loan growth.

C&I loan growth has been well diversified over the past year with notable growth in corporate banking, asset finance, dealer floorplan, and middle market banking. We're also seeing good early traction in our new specialty lending verticals that we announced as part of the 2018 strategic plan. Alternatively, we continue to actively manage our commercial real estate portfolio around current levels with average CRE loans reflecting a 6% year-over-year decrease. This reflects anticipated pay downs as well as our strategic tightening of commercial real estate lending to ensure appropriate returns on capital and to manage risk.

Consumer loan growth remains centered in the residential mortgage and RV and marine portfolios reflecting the well-managed expansion of these two businesses over the past two years. Average residential mortgage loans increased 18% year-over-year. As we typically do, we sold the agency qualified mortgage production in the quarter and retained the jumbo mortgages and specialty mortgage products. Average RV and marine loans increased 33% year-over-year.

Average auto loans increased 2% year-over-year as a result of consistent, disciplined loan production. Originations totaled $1.2 billion for the first quarter, down 14% year-over-year.

As we have previously mentioned, we are executing a pricing strategy to optimize revenue via increased auto loan pricing that has resulted in the lower production volumes, but that is a trade-off we like. New money yields on our auto originations averaged 4.73% during the first quarter, up 85 basis points from the year-ago quarter. The increase in other earning assets shown on this slide reflects the inclusion of deposit balances with the Federal Reserve Bank. These balances were treated as non-earning assets prior to the fourth quarter of 2018.

Finally, securities were down 5% year-over-year, as we let the portfolio run off and utilized the cash flows to fund to higher yielding loans during 2018. During the 2019 first quarter, we began reinvesting portfolio cash flows in new securities driving the linked quarter increase.

Turning now to slide seven. Average total deposits and average core deposits both grew 8% year-over-year. Core certificates of deposits were up 164% from the year-ago quarter primarily reflecting the consumer CD growth initiatives during the first three quarters of 2018. Average money market deposits increased 11% year-over-year, primarily reflecting the shift in promotional pricing away from CDs to consumer money market accounts in mid-2018.

Average interest-bearing DDA deposits increased 6% year-over-year, while average non-interest-bearing DDA deposits decreased 3%. As shown on slide 30 in the appendix, we are very pleased that our consumer non-interest-bearing deposits increased 5% year-over-year, as we continue to grow households and deepen the relationships. We continue to see our commercial customers shift balances from non-interest-bearing DDA to interest-bearing products, primarily interest checking, hybrid checking and money market. Average savings and other domestic deposits decreased 8%, primarily reflecting a continued shift in consumer product mix, particularly among the legacy FirstMerit accounts as FirstMerit's promotional pricing strategy is focused on savings accounts compared to our primary focus on money market. Significantly, our continued focus on core funding resulted in a 56% year-over-year reduction in average short-term borrowings.

Moving now to slide eight. FTE net interest income increased $52 million, or 7% versus the year-ago quarter. Driving this growth was the 4% increase in average earning assets, rising yields in both our consumer and commercial loan portfolios and disciplined deposit pricing. Our GAAP net interest margin was 3.39% for the first quarter, up 9 basis points from the year-ago quarter. The net interest margin decreased 2% -- 2 basis points linked quarter.

Moving to slide nine. Our core net interest margin for the first quarter was 3.33%, up 11 basis points from the year-ago quarter. Purchase accounting accretion contributed 6 basis points to the net interest margin in the current quarter compared to 8 basis points in the year-ago quarter. Slide 26 in the appendix provides information regarding the actual and scheduled impact of the FirstMerit purchase accounting for 2019 and 2020. On a sequential quarter basis, the core NIM compressed 1 basis point, equivalent to the linked quarter decline in the contribution from purchase accounting accretion. As a reminder, the 2018 fourth quarter, both GAAP and core NIMs benefited from 2 basis points of higher-than-normal commercial interests recoveries.

Turning to the earning asset yields. Our commercial loan yields increased 65 basis points year-over-year, while consumer loan yields increased 41 basis point. Our deposit costs remained well contained with the rate paid on total interest-bearing deposits of 94 basis points for the quarter, up 51 basis point year-over-year. Compared to the prior quarter, our total interest-bearing deposit cost increased 10 basis points.

Slide 10 illustrates our cycle-to-date interest-bearing deposit beta compared to peers. Our cumulative deposit beta remains low at 32%. We have been communicating that we believe that consumer core CD strategies we utilized over the first three quarters of 2018 would serve us well over time, effectively frontloading some of the deposit beta. You can see those benefits over the past two quarters as our cumulative data has not increased as quickly as our peers. This quarter, the peer group's average cumulative beta increased 4%, while we saw a 2% increase in our cumulative beta.

As we have mentioned in the last couple of quarters, overall deposit pricing remains rational in our markets. Assuming no additional rate increases, our current forecast assumes modest continued upward pressure on deposit cost driven by continued mix shifts in incremental deposit growth from higher cost products, particularly money market.

Slide 11 provides detail on our non-interest income, which increased 2% from the year-ago quarter. Gain on sale of loans and leases increased 63% year-over-year, primarily reflecting the gain on the sale of asset finance leases and higher SBA loan sales. Mortgage banking income decreased 19%, primarily reflecting a $3 million loss on net mortgage servicing rights in the quarter and lower origination volume.

Capital market fees were relatively flat year-over-year, but there were a few notable items impacting this line. First, during the 2019 first quarter, we recognized a $6 billion unfavorable commodity derivative mark-to-market adjustment related to a commercial customer. Partially offsetting this, the Hutchinson, Shockey and Erley acquisition which closed in October of 2018 contributed $5 million of capital markets fees during the 2019 first quarter. Finally, when not impacting the comparisons, we move syndication fees which, were about $3 million in the 2019 first quarter compared to $2 million in the year-ago quarter into this line item. Syndication fees were previously included in other income. While down sequentially due to normal seasonality, we continued to see positive momentum within our two largest contributors of non-interest income as deposit service charges and card and payment processing fees both posted year-over-year growth. We have been executing our new strategic plan for two quarters now and we are thoughtfully investing in our colleagues' digital technology in our brand.

Slide 12 highlights the components of the $20 million, or 3% year-over-year growth in overhead expense. Personnel cost increased $18 million, or 5% accounting for almost the entire increase. This primarily reflected hiring related to our strategic initiatives, the implementation of annual merit increases in the 2018 second quarter, and increased benefit cost. We have added colleagues in our digital and technology areas and experienced thinkers in our new lending verticals. The major of the increase primarily reflected an $8 million or 11% increase in outside data processing and other services, which was driven by increased technology investments. Deposit and other insurance expense decreased $10 million or 56%, due to the discontinuation of the FDIC surcharge in the 2018 fourth quarter. We remain focused on driving positive operating leverage. As part of our commitments to manage expenses relative to the revenue environment, we self-funded a portion of the expenses related to these new hires and technology investments through the branch rationalization completed at year-end 2018, the elimination of the FDIC surcharge and other efficiency improvement efforts.

Cost savings from the pending Wisconsin branch divestiture will further fund strategic investments going forward. Looking ahead to the 2019 second quarter, we expect non-interest expense will reflect a linked quarter increase of approximately $40 million to $50 million, resulting in the peak quarterly efficiency ratio of the year that were trending down in the back half of the year. Roughly, two-thirds of this expected increase reflects the normal seasonal increase in compensation expense as a result of the annual grants of our long-term incentive compensation in May as well as the May implementation of annual merit increases. Marketing expense accounts for the majority of the remainder of the expected increase reflecting the normal timing of spring campaigns and promotions. The magnitude of these increases is consistent with what we have experienced the past two years. However, these seasonal increases were masked in both of those years by noise related to the FirstMerit acquisition and other non-recurring items. Our full-year 2019 expense expectations remain unchanged as this is normal seasonality in our expenses and has always been incorporated into our expectations.

Slide 13 illustrates the continued strength of our capital ratios. The tangible common equity ratio or TCE ended the quarter at 7.57%, down 13 basis points from a year-ago, but up 36 basis points from the 2018 year-end. The common equity Tier 1 ratio or CET1 ended the quarter at 9.84%, down 61 basis point year-over-year, but up 19 basis points linked quarter. We continue to manage CET1 within our 9% to 10% operating guideline with the bases toward the upper end of the range. We repurchased 60.5 million common shares over the last four quarters. During the 2019 first quarter, we repurchased 1.8 million common shares at an average cost of $13.64 per share, or a total of $25 million of common stock. There is $152 million of share repurchase authorization remaining under the 2018 Capital Plan. We intend to complete the repurchase of the full $152 million of remaining capacity during the 2019 second quarter. During the first quarter, we submitted our 2019 Capital Plan from the Federal Reserve.

Recent regulatory relief moved Huntington and other regional banks our size from annual to biannual CCAR participation, resulting in us not being required to participate in the formal CCAR process this year. However, we will participate in CCAR again in 2020. Therefore, we intend to maintain the normal cadence of announcing our annual Capital Plan and planned capital actions in June. That said, we have previously stated that we are charging a long-term capital return in the 70% to 80% range and a long-term dividend payout ratio target of approximately 40% to 45%. Our submitted 2019 capital plan is consistent with those targets. We have also previously communicated on many instances that our capital priorities are: First, to fund organic growth; second, to support the cash dividend; and finally, all that are capital uses, including the buyback and selective acquisitions. Those capital priorities have not changed.

Slide 14 provides a snapshot of key credit quality metrics for the quarter, which remain strong. Consistent prudent credit underwriting is one of Huntington's core principles, and our financial results continue to reflect our disciplined approach to risk management and our aggregate moderate-to-low risk appetite. We booked loan loss provision expense of $63 million in the first quarter and net charge-offs of $71 million. Net charge-offs represent an annualized 38 basis points of average loans and leases in the current quarter, up from 27 basis points the prior quarter and from 21 basis point in the year-ago quarter. The increase was centered in two specific commercial credit relationships. Consumer charge-offs remained consistent over the past year. There is additional granularity on charge-offs by portfolio in the analyst package in the slides. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of loans remained relatively stable at 1.02%, down 1 basis point linked quarter.

The non-performing asset ratio increased 9 basis points linked quarter and 2 basis points year-over-year to 61 basis points. The year-over-year increase was centered in the C&I portfolio, partially offset by decreases in the commercial real estate portfolio, residential mortgage and home equity portfolios. There was also a year-over-year increase in other NPAs associated with the investment portfolio. Overall, asset quality metrics remain near cyclical lows and as we have noted previously, some quarterly volatility is expected given the absolute low levels of problem loans.

Slide 15 highlights Huntington's strong position to execute on our strategy and provide consistent through-the-cycle shareholder returns. The graph on the top left quadrant represents our continued growth in pre-tax preprovision net revenue as a result of focused execution on our core strategies. The strong level of capital generation positions us well to support balance sheet growth and return capital to our shareholders at an advantage rates over the long-term.

The top right chart highlights the well-balanced mix of our loan and deposit portfolios. We are both a consumer and commercial bank and believe that the diversification of the balance sheet will serve us well over the cycle. Our DFAST Stress Test results on the bottom left highlight our disciplined enterprise risk management. We consistently rank in the top four commercial banks in the severely adverse scenario of DFAST. Finally, the bottom right demonstrates Huntington's strong capital position.

Let me now turn it over to Mark, so we can get to your questions

Mark A. Muth -- Director of Investor Relations

Thanks, Mac. Danna, we'll now take questions. (Operator Instructions) Thank you.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question is coming from Ken Usdin of Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Ken Usdin -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Thanks. Good morning, guys.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Ken Usdin -- Jefferies -- Analyst

A question on the positive way you've maintained the NIM guidance for the full year flat. You took out the remaining rate hikes, as you said, the curve has obviously gotten flatter, but in your slide you still talk about expected through-the-cycle 50% beta versus the low 30s you're at now. So can you talk about the goods and bads in terms of your ability to keep that GAAP NIM flat for the year and how you expect that GAAP in quarter trend from the 3.39% this quarter? Thanks.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Thanks, Ken. It's Mac. So, a few things I'll point out. I mean, we have seen good non-interest-bearing deposit growth in the consumer line on the balance sheet, which continues to help us keep the NIM at a decent level. But we're also very focused on managing both the asset yields and the liability rates. We're very carefully monitoring the rates that we bring on to the balance sheet on the asset side and we're also extremely focused on what we're paying on the deposit side as well. So it's a pretty fluid environment and we just are making sure that from a both asset and liability position we're making good decisions around the rates and yields that we're bringing things on to the balance sheet. We continue to work through some of the headwinds that have been discussed. I mean, clearly, purchase accounting accretion is working against us. We do have some additional costs associated with the hedging program, which is probably 3 basis points on the margin for the full-year. But we monitor these things very frequently and we continue to take actions to make sure that we continue to support the NIM.

Ken Usdin -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Okay. And then my follow-up on that point then so that we just expect that you had mentioned that the core NIM, I think should be up from here or up year-over-year? So just in terms of the underlying core trend we know about the purchase accounting, but if you can just help us understand that the core trend from here? Thanks.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So the core NIM will be up modestly year-over-year. I think you can expect that is going to drift a bit lower on a quarterly basis, but for the year-over-year impact it should be up probably 3 basis points to 4 basis points, something like that.

Ken Usdin -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks, Mac.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Matt O'Connor of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Matt O'Connor -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Good morning, Mac.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Good morning.

Matt O'Connor -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

I was wondering if you can talk about the sustainability of the deposit growth, obviously, very strong at 8% and how you're thinking about that going forward?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

So we can continue to see, I think, really good results on the consumer side of the balance sheet. As I mentioned in the previous answer, 5% year-over-year growth in non-interest-bearing is probably one of the better performances among the peer group. We're very focused on understanding what's happening from a competitive perspective. We're very focused on making sure that we bring things on to the sheet at the right rate. We have many, many programs under way on the retail side of the bank in terms of sales execution, promotional pricing strategies. We look at different products and which products make the most sense for us given what's happening in the marketplace. And we were able to pull those levers pretty well.

So we feel good about the consumer side of the sheet. Commercial is a bit more challenging in terms of just rate expectations. We're monitoring and actually responding to those customer request on a one-off basis. Obviously, we look at the trade-off between what we can bring on a commercial deposit versus overnight funding, but we're very focused on supporting our deep customer relationships and making sure that we do what's right from a customer perspective in that regard. So we're very happy with what we see from a deposit growth on the balance sheet overall. And we continue to believe that we have many levers to be able to continue to see that growth take place.

Matt O'Connor -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Okay. And then, obviously, that implies solid balance sheet growth going forward. And if you're trying to kind of pull it into your capital levels and maybe your buyback expectations for the next capital cycle, what are your thoughts on that? I know you're within your range on the CET1, you are at the high end of the range. So it seems like there might be some flexibility, but obviously the balance sheet growth will also likely be pretty solid. So, how you're thinking about the buybacks in the next cycle here?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. I think we're going to continue to manage through toward the upper end of the CET1 range of 9% to 10%. So you're going to see us to be closer to the 10%. And we feel like we have a good balance of asset growth funded through core deposits and maintaining our capital levels at that 10% -- near 10% CET1 level. So we haven't given our specific capital return expectations for the 2019 CCAR process. But as I'd mentioned in my comments, we're going to be 70% to 80% total and 40% to 45% dividend payout.

Matt O'Connor -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Jon Arfstrom of RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Great. Thanks. Just a question on credit, maybe for Steve or Dan. Just the nature of the new NPLs and give us comfort that this is truly isolated in terms of what you're seeing on overall credit?

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Sure. Yeah. So it's obviously something we monitor very closely is what's coming in the bucket, and what we're seeing is no concentration by sector, geography et cetera. So, the four largest NPLs we had were all different industries. And I think the flow this quarter if you look at what we've been experiencing over the last year or so, it is lumpy. We've had a number of quarters where it improves and then we'll see a few move in an opposite direction, but if you look at our NPA and then NAL ratios year-over-year 2 basis points difference than what it was. So we remain very confident. We are not changing our outlook based on the new flows in terms of charge-offs of provision expense. So this -- I think it all proves itself out that quarter-to-quarter, we see ups and downs. This happen to be a quarter, we're up a bit.

Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. That helps. And then, Steve, you've said pretty clearly you do not foresee a recession, but if you do start to see signs, what might change in terms of your approach?

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, we've been working for years, Jon, with a view that something has been imminent and not obviously wrong. So we've done a number of things and we're maintaining those. So I think it's 3, 3.5 years ago, the teams led by Dan pulled back on leverage lending. We've done a lot with commercial real estate, construction in particular. The concentration discipline stay in flow. This focus on portfolio management and assuming that there's something likely to occur near term, now for the couple -- last couple of years has caused us to bolster our capabilities and our MIS. There are a whole series of things that we've already done and are maintaining. Now, if we see it turning, we will start adjusting where we think there's going to be further impact if to the extent we think there is any policy adjustment or other things. But it -- we're running it fairly conservatively as we said we have been for a number of years notwithstanding the growth and expect that we're going to have relatively consistent performance through the cycle.

Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Okay. All right. Thank you.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is from Ken Zerbe of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Great. Thanks. My first question, just in terms of expenses, if I got it right, it was up $40 million, $50 million in 2Q, but then how should we think about the second half? Does some of that marketing expense come down and total expenses come down for the rest of the year? Or does it stay at that sort of 2Q level?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, Ken it's Mac. So you will see expenses come down in the third and fourth quarters. Yeah, the spike that we see in the second quarter is normal and has been included in all the guidance that we've been giving throughout the period. So you will see the efficiency ratio at its peak in the second quarter and it will come down in the third and fourth quarters.

Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

Okay. That helps. And then just second question, in terms of the hedging activities, I guess given that the Fed fund futures curve is already pricing in a rate cut, can you just walk us through the logic, like how much more hedging do you want to do and does it make sense to do it if the curves already building in potential rate cuts from here? Thanks.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Ken, so we're kind of implementing our way into the hedge position. We have about, let's say, $4 billion on at the end of first quarter. We're primarily focused on putting on BOR-OIS at this point making sure that just in case we do get a rate hike from the Fed we still benefit from that. But clearly just given some of the uncertainty in direction of interest rates and given our asset sensitivity position, we just think it's a prudent exercise to go through and reduce some of that asset sensitivity, while still maintaining the upside using the BOR-OIS at this point in time.

Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

All right. Okay. Thank you.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, thanks, Ken.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from John Pancari of Evercore. Please go ahead.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Good morning.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, John.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Good morning, John.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Back to the credit topic. Regarding the 19% increase in NPAs, I know you mentioned that it's not any one industry. I know you see the largest existing NPLs are not in any one, but how about the inflows this quarter, it looks like a big portion of it came from auto suppliers?

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Well, actually since our numbers are so low, John, that the increase is in one credit. It was our largest inflow in the quarter, but that is one deal. And of the four largest inflow this quarter they are in the four different industries, they originated in different -- they're not all from one vintage, they're not all in a singular geography. I mean, that's just the dispersion happened in the few more this quarter than we typically do.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Got it. And has that one large credit that went in, has that already been reserved for or no?

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

It has and we foresee a favorable outcome on that particular deal.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Got it.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Later this year actually. So you also -- Dan has accounted for, the SNCC exams in the current reserves as well.

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Yeah. And we didn't have tremendous activity this quarter but the SNCC results are incorporated in everything you see today.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Okay. Got it. All right. And then separately on capital, I know you reiterated the higher end of that 9% to 10% CET1 target. Like what keeps you near that high end? What keeps you at that biased versus potentially moving toward the lower end of it over time? Thanks.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes. So we just feel more comfortable operating at the higher end of that range. And if you take a look at us relative to our peer groups, we are a bit lower than the peer group. We do believe that the peer group is migrating down to us as they execute on their capital actions. But we feel comfortable at the higher level and obviously we're producing industry-leading returns at that higher capital level. So we feel very good about how we're positioned.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

John, there is a little bit of history where the capital was deployed substantially in the FirstMerit acquisition. So we pulled the capital levels down with an expectation of replenishing over time and we've talked about being or expecting that we're somewhere later in the cycle, so that would guide us to the higher end of that range.

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Got it. Okay. Thanks, guys.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Steven Alexopoulos of JP Morgan. Please go ahead.

Steven Alexopoulos -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Hey, good morning, everybody. So on the NIM, I'm trying to better understand the offsets to the higher deposit cost coming and which we think will get us modest NIM expansion on core this year. If we look at the rates on new loans and new securities that you are adding each quarter, how much above the current earning asset yield are those coming into the book?

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, Steven, so virtually all of the new production that we're putting on the sheet it is going to be higher than the back book on the asset side. We've been particularly focused on indirect auto pricing. We've been very successful in raising pricing, which has had the result of reducing origination but we're fine with that trade-off. We've also been very focused on really pricing across the entire consumer loan category. Resi mortgage has been an another area of focus for us. And then on the commercial side, we are in the middle of renewal season and we're looking for opportunities to continue to increase our pricing there. So we're very active on the asset side in terms of things that we're doing just to make sure that we're getting every basis point to help offset some of the continued pressure on the deposit side. We are going to see continued migration of deposit rates up over the last half of the year, but that is all factored into our guidance and we do feel comfortable with the expectations that we put out there for the NIM.

Steven Alexopoulos -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Okay. And then -- thank you. And then just for a follow-up, if we look at the $23 billion of money market deposits, that's average your paying around 1%, where do you see that topping out assuming if that stays on hold here?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

So it will continue to migrate higher. We basically run 6-month special pricing and then it comes back to a lower rate. I'm not quite sure that we're going to see it migrate much higher. It's probably going to be 25 basis points , 50 basis points perhaps. But it just depends on the level of competition what's happening in the marketplace and how we choose to fund the balance sheet. You saw us move to CDs in early 2018, because we thought that was the opportunity. We switched back to money market kind of middle of 2018, but we're always looking at what is happening in the market from a competition perspective and we're pretty good at finding the right levers in terms of getting the right growth.

Steven Alexopoulos -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Mac, you're seeing -- you have mentioned commercial customers still moving out of non-interest-bearing into products like this. Is that continuing at the same pace? Or now the rates have stabilized, are you seeing that ease? Thanks.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, I do think it is easing a bit. We did see continued migration in the first quarter and it's going to continue to migrate. But I do think that the rate of migration has slowed down.

Steven Alexopoulos -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks for taking my questions.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, thanks, Steve.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Steve.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Peter Winter of Wedbush Securities. Please go ahead.

Peter Winter -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Good morning.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Peter.

Peter Winter -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

You guys had a very strong quarter on C&I loan growth and I'm just wondering, do you think that type of growth rate is sustainable? Or were there some other factors that contributed to that growth that might reverse over time?

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Yeah this is Dan. Well, I think generally our customers continue to be fairly positive. So the pipeline remains strong. I think the growth was diversified in that not any one area accounted for the bulk of it, everything from middle market to our business credit asset base, healthcare, they all contributed. So I think that it's within our risk appetite where -- we have certainly pulled back where we feel we can't compete within our risk appetite. So I don't see any meaningful shifts in the volumes that we would anticipate for the balance of the year.

Peter Winter -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Okay. And then just staying on the loan side. Mac, I heard your comments about the increase in the auto pricing for the auto loans. I did notice that quarter-to-quarter auto loans decline. Would you expect that to be a temporary decline?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Peter, it's likely going to be stable to declining going forward, because we're very pleased with the pricing actions that we're taking. We're very pleased with the volumes that we're generating. And we just think it's the right tactic given where we are from a rate perspective and the concentration of auto on the balance sheet. So I would expect stable to declining going forward.

Peter Winter -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks, Mac.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Thanks, Peter.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Kevin Barker of Piper Jaffray. Please go ahead.

Kevin Barker -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

I just wanted to follow-up on some of the capital. I noticed, I mean, the amount of buybacks in the first quarter were relatively low compared to first two quarters and then you still had a lot left over. Is there any reason behind pulling back on the buybacks in the first quarter versus leaving significant more for the second quarter?

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

It really just looking at some of the volatility and some of the events in the first quarter, I mean, Brexit and other items just had us hit the pause button for a while. We did do the $25 million and we will complete the remaining $152 million in the second quarter. But really just taking a look at the environment and maybe being a little more cautious about the buyback, but we'll pick it up in the second quarter.

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

We also pulled a -- about a little less than $100 million forward from the plan as approved by the Fed for the year, put it in -- accelerated into the fourth quarter. So if you will, we almost prefunded the fourth quarter with the first quarter.

Kevin Barker -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Okay. And then to follow-up on some of the credit comments. Was any change in the severity that you saw on any of these loans? Or I guess, the recovery amount that you would get on some of the commercial loans than you've seen in the past given the credit losses that we saw this quarter?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So I think severity, no. Now recoveries are slowly dwindling. So a small portion of the increase in net charge-offs was from lower recoveries. So that's just a fact given how lower charge-offs have been. But I think when you look at the portfolio as a whole, everything was really rocksteady with the exception of C&I. And I just think for context, if you look at the C&I category, again, if you average the last four quarters, we had 15 basis points of charge-offs. Two quarters ago, we actually had net recoveries. So I think it's important to look at that in total because as we've mentioned in a quarter anything can happen and I think this quarter we happened to see just a little bit more activity than normal, but overall, we feel really confident in the book.

Kevin Barker -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Scott Siefers of Sandler O'Neill. Please go ahead.

Scott Siefers -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Good morning, guys.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Scott.

Scott Siefers -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Thanks for taking my question. Okay. I was just hoping, Mac, you might be able to touch on some of the key drivers that you see going through the remainder of the year. I guess sort of underlying the question is, if we were to sort of target the midpoint of your revenue growth range, it implies a pretty substantial ramp in the remaining three quarters of the year relative to the base from the first quarter. And of course, we're entering the seasonally stronger periods of the year. But just curious to hear your thoughts on what would be the main drivers that that caused that shift up in the base of fees and revenues overall?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. Thanks, Scott. So it's important to remember that the first quarter is seasonally low for us and we also had about $10 million of unusual items, if you think about the MSR and then the commodities write down. So that that's roughly $9.5 million, $10 million. So a little bit light in the first quarter driven by those two events and also just the normal seasonality. Going forward, it's going to be the usual suspects. We're going to see growth -- we'll continue to see growth in deposit service charges as we bring on new customers and we're continuing to see good household growth and good deep relationships. We've got some new treasury management capabilities coming out this year in business banking that should help us significantly as we move through the year. The capital markets line just continues to grow for us. The Hutchinson Shockey acquisition is going to help quite a bit. And we've made good investments in people and our product in that group. The payments line is a good grower for us. It's debit, credit, ATM, merchant processing and that's going to continue to show good growth as well. So I do recognize some of the weakness in the first quarter, but I feel good about the remainder of the year, with mortgage in particular coming back in the spring as we would typically see it. So, yeah, I think the outlook for the year should be good.

Scott Siefers -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

All right. I appreciate that color. Thank you very much

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Scott.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Scott.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Brock Vandervliet of UBS. Please go ahead.

Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst

Good morning. Yeah, going back to the margin theme, I think other questions have covered the deposit dynamics, but could you talk about borrowings. The sequential growth in borrowings I noted this quarter very similar to last year where it grew very quickly in Q1 and then you tapered it down the rest of the year. Is that likely to be the similar pattern this year?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Yes, Brock. I would expect that be a very similar pattern to what you saw last year. And it just does come back a bit to some of the seasonality on deposit growth and deposit usage among our customers. And first quarter is always a bit seasonally low and then the growth comes back as we move through the year. So that is typically what happens.

Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst

Okay. Great. And just as a follow-up on in terms of loan repricing and sort of tailwinds you may have there, could you just review of the portion of the loan book that's variable rate, how much is tied to LIBOR versus other longer term rates?

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

I think it's about 60% of the portfolio is tied to 1-month LIBOR.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

It's floating.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

It's floating. Okay.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

And the biggest fees would be 1-month LIBOR within that.

Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst

Okay, got it. Fine on that. Thank you.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Brock.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, we have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to Steve Steinour for closing comments.

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

So thank you. Before I wrap up, we wanted to take a minute to thank our Chief Credit Officer, Dan Neumeyer, for his decade of service with Huntington. Today is his final earnings conference call before his retirement in June. And his leadership in the aftermath of the global financial crisis drove the company to be where it is today in terms of performance. Dan's been a vital leader in instilling Huntington's credit culture and discipline and establishing our risk management -- credit risk management infrastructure. So thank you very much, Dan.

Now we're pleased that Rich Pohle, currently our Deputy Chief Credit Officer and Senior Commercial Credit Approval Officer will be stepping up into the Chief Credit Officer role upon Dan's retirement. Rich has been a key member of the Huntington team for almost a decade, and our team will benefit from his disciplined approach and many years of experience.

Our first quarter results provided a good start to the year and I'm confident about our prospects for the full year. Our top priorities remain executing our strategic plan to prudently grow revenue and to thoughtfully invest in our businesses for continued organic growth. We're building long-term shareholder value through a diligent focus on top quartile financial performance and consistently disciplined risk management.

And finally, I always like to end with a reminder to our shareholders that there's a high level of alignment between the Board, management, our colleagues and our shareholders. The Board and our colleagues are collectively the seventh largest shareholder of Huntington, and all of us are appropriately focused on driving sustained long-term performance. So thank you for your interest in Huntington. We appreciate you joining us today. Have a great day.

Operator

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.

Duration: 53 minutes

Call participants:

Mark A. Muth -- Director of Investor Relations

Stephen D. Steinour -- Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

Howell D. McCullough -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Ken Usdin -- Jefferies -- Analyst

Matt O'Connor -- Deutsche Bank -- Analyst

Jon Arfstrom -- RBC Capital Markets -- Analyst

Daniel J. Neumeyer -- Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer

Ken Zerbe -- Morgan Stanley -- Analyst

John Pancari -- Evercore ISI -- Analyst

Steven Alexopoulos -- JP Morgan -- Analyst

Peter Winter -- Wedbush Securities -- Analyst

Kevin Barker -- Piper Jaffray -- Analyst

Scott Siefers -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Brock Vandervliet -- UBS -- Analyst

More HBAN analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

More From The Motley Fool

• 10 Best Stocks to Buy Today

• The $16,728 Social Security Bonus You Cannot Afford to Miss

• 20 of the Top Stocks to Buy (Including the Two Every Investor Should Own)

• What Is an ETF?

• 5 Recession-Proof Stocks

• How to Beat the Market

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.