'You saw this pick cheered among the business community': What Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court nod could mean for the business world
Neil Gorsuch
Neil Gorsuch

(Neil Gorsuch.Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Neil Gorsuch, the 10th Circuit judge nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacant seat on the US Supreme Court, is widely expected to favor big business should he be confirmed by the Senate.

"The [Chief Justice John] Roberts court has been the most pro-business Supreme Court in the history of the court," Michael Burg, founder of the Denver-based law firm Burg, Simpson, Eldredge, Hersh & Jardine, told Business Insider.

"When I look at Judge Gorsuch, do I think he is pro-business? The answer is yes," he added. "Does he match up with Justice Scalia in terms of his view of the Constitution and that you have to go back and look at the Constitution in terms of how the framers and the founders meant it to be in 1789? Yes."

Carter Phillips, a Washington, DC, lawyer who has argued before the Supreme Court more than any other attorney in private practice, said a Gorsuch appointment to the court would, in all likelihood, keep with the "status quo."

"It will be pretty much how the court was prior to Justice Scalia's death," he said, later adding, "[It] will largely be the path the court will continue [on] in a way that is fundamentally different than the way it would've if Judge [Merrick] Garland's nomination had not died on the vine the way it did."

But, both said they believe the door is open to some change.

The expectation Gorsuch will rule on the side of big business has been drawn from the opinions he authored while serving on the 10th Circuit court's bench. In that role, he was not able to rule on many big business-related cases, due to the court's locale.

As a result, how he would rule on several major business issues almost certain to hit the court within the next few years is not fully known.

"I don't view Judge Gorsuch as a clone of Justice Scalia," Phillips said. "I'm sure he may have places where he differences with [Scalia] on particular nuances."

One of the biggest upcoming areas where Gorsuch could potentially make a difference is in his interpretation of what's known as "Chevron deference," named for a 1984 case in which the court ruled the interpretation of a government agency should be deferred to when a law or statute it administers is under question. It quite predictably has a major affect on the regulatory state, and critics say it provides such agencies with vast power not permitted to other sectors of the government.

It's one of several business-related areas where those watching the court have a sense of where Gorsuch would come down, as Gorsuch is an avowed textualist and originalist.