In This Article:
(Bloomberg) -- Amazon.com Inc. continued blocking sellers from offering lower prices on rival sites, despite assuring antitrust enforcers it ended its policy that artificially inflated prices for consumers, according to newly unsealed filings in California’s antitrust lawsuit against the e-commerce giant.
Most Read from Bloomberg
-
Airline Blunder Sells $10,000 Asia-US Business Class Tickets for $300
-
Worthless Degrees Are Creating an Unemployable Generation in India
-
Disney Is Set to Eliminate Thousands of Jobs Starting Next Week
The Seattle-based company planned to expand penalties on sellers who presented lower prices outside Amazon, even after it claimed in 2019 that it stopped punishing third-party merchants who posted better deals on Walmart, Target, eBay, and, in some instances, their own websites, according to previously redacted portions of the suit that were made public Friday.
Amazon knew its sellers lived “in constant fear” of account suspensions or fast-selling products being taken down, according to an internal company document cited in the complaint.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta is seeking a court order blocking Amazon from continuing to engage in what he alleged is anticompetitive behavior, as well as compensation for consumers in the most populous US state. A similar suit filed by Washington, DC, was dismissed in 2021.
“Many of the complaint’s allegations are inaccurate,” a spokesperson for Amazon said. “We look forward to presenting the facts to the court.”
Amazon has previously said in its defense that sellers set their own prices in the company’s online store.
“There is no shortage of evidence showing that the ‘Everything store’ is costing consumers more for just about everything,” Bonta said in a statement.
A San Francisco state judge in March denied Amazon’s request for dismissal of California’s claims, saying he was “unpersuaded” by the company’s argument that the state didn’t adequately allege how pricing practices had a market-wide anticompetitive effect.
Internal documents show an Amazon executive saying that expanded penalties “may generate pushback given recent positive press about our change to remove the previous price parity clause” from agreements with merchants that prevented third-party sellers from offering lower prices on other sites. The company expected the media and sellers would claim the policy “was not only trivial but a trick and an attempt to garner goodwill with policy makers amid increasing competition concerns,” according to the complaint.