In This Article:
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Garo Aktiebolag (publ) (STO:GARO) does carry debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
When Is Debt Dangerous?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Having said that, the most common situation is where a company manages its debt reasonably well - and to its own advantage. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
Check out our latest analysis for Garo Aktiebolag
What Is Garo Aktiebolag's Debt?
As you can see below, at the end of June 2019, Garo Aktiebolag had kr109.4m of debt, up from kr101.2m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. On the flip side, it has kr7.10m in cash leading to net debt of about kr102.3m.
How Strong Is Garo Aktiebolag's Balance Sheet?
The latest balance sheet data shows that Garo Aktiebolag had liabilities of kr271.5m due within a year, and liabilities of kr71.5m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of kr7.10m and kr233.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities total kr102.5m more than the combination of its cash and short-term receivables.
Since publicly traded Garo Aktiebolag shares are worth a total of kr2.73b, it seems unlikely that this level of liabilities would be a major threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.