Engine Capital Urges Fellow Shareholders to Support All Six of its Director Candidates at Dye & Durham’s Upcoming Annual Meeting

In This Article:

Asks Shareholders to Vote for All Six Engine Directors on the Dissident BLUE Proxy Card to Prevent Failed CEO Matt Proud’s Reelection

Calls on Chair Colleen Moorehead to Ensure a Transparent and Fair Election

NEW YORK, December 09, 2024--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Engine Capital LP (together with its affiliates, "Engine" or "we"), which owns approximately 7.1% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Dye & Durham Limited (TSX: DND) ("Dye & Durham" or the "Company"), today published an open letter to its fellow shareholders outlining the path to a brighter future at Dye & Durham. Engine is asking shareholders to vote on the BLUE proxy card, as was recommended by leading proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. ("ISS"), to elect all six of Engine’s directors to the Company’s Board of Directors (the "Board") at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting"): Arnaud Ajdler, Hans T. Gieskes, Tracey Keates, Ritu Khanna, Anthony Kinnear and Sid Singh.

***

Fellow Shareholders,

Engine has been working for nearly a year to bring positive changes to Dye & Durham. We are so close. If you, like us, believe reelecting failed CEO Matt Proud would impede these positive changes, it is critical to vote for all SIX of Engine’s nominees. If you are tempted to "mix and match" directors from the different slates, we want to make you aware that there is a substantial risk Mr. Proud will be reelected to the Board due to vote splitting. We suspect that if he is reelected, Mr. Proud will seek to make himself Chair of the Board, which would effectively enable him to continue leading the Company after receiving an unnecessary $10 million parachute payment to step down as CEO.

It is also critical that you vote using the Engine BLUE proxy card because we are concerned that the Colleen Moorehead-led Board could invalidate certain Company proxies without our awareness. As is typical in contested elections, we asked the Board to agree to certain customary arrangements to ensure the December 17th Annual Meeting is conducted fairly and transparently. These arrangements are even more important because the Board insists on convening the meeting virtually, with no option for in-person attendance. Notably, the Board rejected our request for an independent Chair, allowing Ms. Moorehead (whose own seat is at risk) to chair the contested meeting. As Chair, Ms. Moorehead will have substantial power over the meeting’s conduct, including deciding on the validity of proxies. To ensure transparency, Engine also asked for the opportunity to review proxies with the Company following the deposit deadline so that all parties are operating on a level playing field and can resolve any issues before the meeting.