FDA is, of course, government shorthand for the Food and Drug Administration or, as Helena Bottemiller Evich makes crystal clear in a deeply-sourced, richly detailed April 8 exposé, the Food and Drug Administration.
The emphasis is required, explains Bottemiller Evich, a senior editor and ag reporter at Politico, because “a months long … investigation” found “that regulating food is simply not a high priority at the agency, where drugs and other medical products dominate …”
That’s a deadly problem for every American because the FDA “oversees nearly 80 percent of the American food supply.” For decades, though, it hasn’t done that job well, FDA official after FDA official told Bottemiller Evich.
For example, she notes, “‘There are a lot of things that languish,’” Stepan Ostroff, “who twice served as acting commissioner of FDA,” told her. “‘There’s nobody pushing very hard to get them done … We don’t have that … pressure to actually make things happen on the food side.’”
More pointedly, “When Politico called Ostroff, he was so eager to discuss the agency’s problems, he prepared a laundry list of his concerns.”
Indeed, FDA slowness is so achingly deliberate that it borders on incompetence. Examples abound: It was years before FDA acknowledged dangerous pathogens and heavy metal contamination in baby foods; it was “slow” to recognize the danger of “PFAS, so-called forever chemicals” found in food packaging; and it spent “the better part of a decade working on voluntary sodium reduction goals” while “other countries moved ahead with their own years ago.”
This tortoise approach with the nation’s food safety carries a price. “This government dysfunction has a real impact …” Bottemiller Evich writes. “The CDC (Center for Disease Control) estimates that more than 128,000 are hospitalized and 3,000 people die from foodborne illnesses each year — a toll that has not lessened after a sweeping update to food safety a decade ago.”
And the dysfunction is bipartisan. Republican and Democratic White Houses and Congresses have both been badly served by FDA, reports Bottemiller Evich, who spoke with “more than 50 people” and found a “remarkable level of consensus that the agency is simply not working.”
It’s more than that, though. Former — and, remarkably, even current — “officials and industry professionals used terms like ‘ridiculous,’ ‘impossible,’ ‘broken,’ ‘byzantine,’ and ‘a joke’ to describe the state of food regulation at FDA.”
Some of FDA’s problems are tied to its dual mission — both food and drug safety. “‘They have too many programs and not enough resources,’” Bottemiller Evich quotes one principal deputy commissioner, “‘and the mismatch is profound.’”