Glass Lewis Joins ISS in Recommending Dye & Durham Shareholders Vote Engine Capital’s BLUE Proxy Card "FOR" Meaningful Boardroom Change at Dye & Durham

In This Article:

Glass Lewis Recommends Shareholders Vote "FOR" Engine Nominees Arnaud Ajdler, Hans T. Gieskes, Anthony Kinnear and Sid Singh

Glass Lewis Also Recommends Shareholders "WITHHOLD" on CEO Matthew Proud, Chair Colleen Moorehead, Compensation Committee Chair Edward Prittie and Director Luke McCormick

Glass Lewis States "Investors Would Be Well Served Endorsing Substantive Change to the DND Board at This Time"

Engine Reminds Shareholders to Vote for ALL SIX of Its Directors on the BLUE Proxy Card by 10:30am EST TODAY

NEW YORK, December 12, 2024--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Engine Capital LP (together with its affiliates, "Engine" or "we"), which owns approximately 7.1% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Dye & Durham Limited (TSX: DND) ("Dye & Durham" or the "Company"), today announced that Glass, Lewis & Co. ("Glass Lewis") has recommended that Dye & Durham shareholders support meaningful boardroom change by voting for four of its six directors at the Company’s 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on December 17, 2024. Glass Lewis recommends that shareholders vote the BLUE proxy card to elect Arnaud Ajdler, Hans T. Gieskes, Anthony Kinnear and Sid Singh to the Board of Directors (the "Board").

Glass Lewis also recommends that shareholders WITHHOLD votes for CEO Matt Proud, Board Chair Colleen Moorehead, Chair of the Compensation Committee Edward Prittie and director Luke McCormick.

Mr. Ajdler, Founder and Managing Partner of Engine, commented:

"We appreciate the endorsement for meaningful boardroom change at Dye & Durham from both leading independent proxy advisory firms. In their reports, Glass Lewis and ISS rebuke the Board – led by Chair Colleen Moorehead and CEO Matt Proud – for its failure to generate value since the Company’s 2020 IPO and for its use of several entrenchment tactics to prevent shareholders from having their say. Notably, both Glass Lewis and ISS agree with our concerns regarding the potential for Mr. Proud to disrupt progress at the Company, including its search for a new CEO, if he were reelected to the Board."

In its full report, Glass Lewis highlighted its rationale in recommending shareholders vote for meaningful boardroom change:1

  • "[…] we do not consider DND has, by its own benchmark, convincingly established any particularly durable legacy of consistent, competitive value creation since listing."

  • "[…] DND seems to take material analytical and/or narrative liberties, including by failing to address key concerns which otherwise serve to underscore doubts surrounding the efficacy of the current board […] we believe adequate cause exists to suggest investors would be well served endorsing substantive change to the DND board at this time."

  • "DND's reported severance payment of C$10 million to Mr. Proud — to which he was not entitled and about which DND has provided investors no substantive commentary or transparency — is decidedly disconcerting […]"

  • "We do not find any of these steps to be indicative of a board interested in the timely exercise of the shareholder franchise, and instead consider these patterns to be much more consistent with a board determined to employ a fairly wide range of stall tactics and entrenchment mechanisms."

  • "The reasons to oppose Mr. Proud's candidacy are, in our view, expansive. We are also concerned Mr. Proud appears to be at the center of DND's overworked executive turnstile, a circumstance which amplifies already significant uncertainty regarding his prospective willingness to leverage the existing investor rights agreement to appoint himself board chair concurrent with the board's effort to identify and retain his successor."

  • "[…] we believe [Ms. Moorehead’s] service as board chair during DND's expansive efforts to blunt the shareholder franchise hardly serves as a particularly auspicious indication of her willingness or ability to effectively and reliably represent unaffiliated investor interests."

  • "The issue of customer value add is also fraught for the board, as Engine reasonably highlights consistently and pointedly negative responses to material price increases (including at least one lawsuit) and a failure to stick to messaged price freezes, which developments the Dissident believes have damaged DND's credibility and driven significant customer losses."

  • "We believe the foregoing Engine candidates represent a favorable cross-section of independence, executive service, relevant industry expertise and prior public company board experience, giving us a reasonable degree of confidence they will be well situated to swiftly contribute to necessary deliberations relating to myriad issues at DND."