Yahoo Finance

(Bloomberg) -- Two of Wall Street’s top investment banks cautioned that the impact of a court ruling striking down many of President Donald Trump’s tariff measures may prove limited, given that the administration has other avenues to impose import duties.

Most Read from Bloomberg

• NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months

• NY Wins Order Against US Funding Freeze in Congestion Fight

• Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana’s Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania

• NY Congestion Pricing Is Likely to Stay Until Year End During Court Case

• The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move

“The tariff levels that we had yesterday are probably going to be the tariff levels that we have tomorrow, because there are so many different authorities the administration can reach into to put it back together,” Michael Zezas, Morgan Stanley’s global head of fixed income and thematic research, said on Bloomberg TV Thursday.

Subscribe to the Bloomberg Daybreak Podcast on Apple, Spotify and other Podcast Platforms.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc.’s Alec Phillips wrote in a note to clients late Wednesday that “this ruling represents a setback for the administration’s tariff plans and increases uncertainty but might not change the final outcome for most major US trading partners.”

The judgment by the US Court of International Trade halts 6.7 percentage points of levies announced this year and the White House could use other tariff tools to make up for that, wrote Phillips, Goldman’s chief US political economist. “For now, we expect the Trump administration will find other ways to impose tariffs.”

Zezas had a similar assessment.

Trump’s power to “raise and escalate — it might be a little bit slower moving, but it is still there.” Talks with countries such as Japan were always likely to take time, he said. And while they proceed, the administration would be able to “stitch together that authority on the other tariffs that went away — so all the same leverage is effectively there during the negotiation.”

For now, the White House is signaling it’s not planning to proceed with other tools.

“There are different approaches that would take a couple of months” to put in place, Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, said on Fox Business Thursday.

Hassett said those would include “procedures that have been approved in the past or approved in the last administration. But we’re not planning to pursue those right now because we’re very, very confident that this really is incorrect.”

Alternatives include the use of Section 232 levies, referring to the charges on steel, aluminum and auto imports on national security grounds. If all the pending investigations result in 25% tariffs and are added to current levies under the section, that would add 7.6 percentage points alone, according to Goldman.