Madoff whistleblower says two key clues put GE on his radar

The accountant who uncovered Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme is again blowing his whistle, this time going after GE (GE) for its accounting practices in a 175-page report.

Harry Markopolos, a forensic accountant, is calling the alleged fraud “bigger than Enron and WorldCom combined,” contending it amounts to $38 billion or 40% of GE’s market cap.

The report — a collaboration between Markopolos and his colleagues and an undisclosed hedge fund with a short position on GE — alleges the conglomerate has been hiding massive losses on eight long-term care insurance deals it executed.

In the report, Markopolos says two key clues put GE on his radar: so-called negative surprises and a decade’s worth of interviews with GE executives who refused to discuss the past.

‘The biggest clue’

“The biggest clue that this is an Enronesque accounting fraud were the $53.5 billion in Negative Surprises in 2017 and 2018 which destroyed over $130 billion in market capitalization,” Markopolos writes.

WASHINGTON - FEBRUARY 04:  Harry Markopolos testifies during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill February 4, 2009 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on the alleged $50 billion dollar Madoff ponzi scheme and regulatory failures.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
Harry Markopolos testifies during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill February 4, 2009 in Washington, DC. The committee is hearing testimony on the alleged $50 billion dollar Madoff ponzi scheme and regulatory failures. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

The report notes several large negative surprises, including dividend cuts totalling $8 billion per year, $15 billion added to long-term care insurance reserves, a $22 billion writedown.

“When you see that many large dollar adjustments in such a short time frame that’s not house-cleaning, it’s a red flag that the prior years’ financial statements were false, internal controls are weak to non-existent, and there are a lot more cockroaches in the GE earnings’ kitchen that you haven’t seen yet,” Markopolos continued.

The second clue? GE executives never seemed to want to discuss these negative events in media interviews, according to Markopolos.

“When asked what went wrong with all of these acquisitions, asset sales, negative earnings surprises, surprise write-downs and dividend cuts, senior leadership of this company repeats the same message, ‘We’re not here to discuss the past, we’re only going to discuss the future,’” wrote Markopolos. “This is no surprise — from people who have something to hide.”

GE disputes Markopolos’s claims. “We have never met, spoken to or had contact with this person. While we can’t comment on the detailed content of a report that we haven’t seen, the allegations we have heard are entirely false and misleading,” the company said in a statement. “GE stands behind its financials. We operate to the highest-level of integrity in our financial reporting and we have clearly laid out our financial obligations in great detail.”

‘GE’s earnings numbers couldn’t be true’

Markopolos says he first became aware of potential accounting irregularities with the company in the late 1990s at the CFA Society of Boston.