Should Investors Buy Starbucks Stock as It Looks to Turn the Corner?

In This Article:

Key Points

  • Starbucks saw an improvement in its same-store sales, but profitability fell short of expectations.

  • The company is investing in labor, which has driven up expenses.

  • While its labor investments lowered profitability, it is the right move over the long run.

News of some progress in turning around its lagging same-store sales was not enough to keep share prices of Starbucks (NASDAQ: SBUX) from dropping, partly because its fiscal second-quarter earnings fell well short of expectations. The stock now trades below the initial surge it experienced following the announcement that former Chipotle head Brian Niccol would assume the position of CEO.

Niccol was not left with an easy task, and he has decided to invest in human labor over just equipment as a way to increase efficiency and enhance the customer experience. This was something that I wrote needed to be done before he took over, even though it would lead to higher expenses, and something I predicted Niccol would do back in September.

Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue »

The decision led to higher expenses in the quarter, with store operating expenses climbing 12% year over year and increasing to 47.7% of revenue compared to 43.5% a year ago. Starbucks' overall operating margin contracted 450 basis points to 8.2%, which it said was largely due to the "surgical addition of labor into [its] stores."

Starbucks' stores were understaffed to reduce costs under its old leadership, which just wasn't sustainable. On its earnings call, Niccol noted that the company had previously been removing labor from its stores in the hope that equipment would offset the removal. However, he said that "investments in labor rather than equipment are more effective at improving throughput and driving transaction growth."

As a side note, one of the most amusing things on the earnings call was an analyst saying they thought that the company had been investing heavily in labor over the past few years. Apparently, they weren't doing a lot of in-the-field research.

Perhaps not surprisingly, then, the increased expenses seemed to catch analysts by surprise. The end result was that Starbucks' adjusted earnings per share (EPS) fell 40% year over year to $0.41 and badly missed the $0.49 analyst consensus, as compiled by LSEG.

Same-store sales improvement

On the bright side, Starbucks' investment in labor appears to be having an early positive effect on its same-store sales. While the company saw its comparable-store sales fall for the fifth-straight quarter, the 1% sales decrease was actually an improvement from recent quarters. Global traffic fell 2%, while it saw a 1% increase in the average ticket.