Ramstad: Minnesota businesses are known for civic engagement, but is it weakening?

In This Article:

Civic involvement by business owners and leaders in Minnesota communities looks strong — at least on the surface.

Dig deeper and you'll hear concerns about forces that have hurt many organizations — from churches to service clubs to affinity groups — that rely heavily on time and money from volunteers.

Leaders are seeing a loss of public-mindedness and a major change in habits: People just don't go out as much after becoming homebound in the pandemic.

Nonoko Sato, executive director of the Minnesota Council of Nonprofits, recently told me the quickest way to contribute to the civic good is simply to show up.

"It's not necessarily about money, though I do think that's important," Sato said. "It is as simple as going to see a show at the theater. If you look at arts organizations, people aren't coming back from staying home in the pandemic era."

A small but growing number of experts on governance and economics are also worried that an erosion of establishment forces is a reason people are unable to tackle hard problems.

"I have become concerned in recent years that the existing stock of social capital in Minnesota has become depleted, and I do not see significant efforts to replenish it," said Steve Young, executive director of the St. Paul-based Caux Round Table for Moral Capitalism.

"Social capital is when you come together and form a critical mass of will and ideas," he added. "It's that critical mass that allows you to go out and make a difference."

Most American cities benefited in the 20th century from groups of prominent business leaders who influenced other institutions such as school systems and arts groups for the greater good.

They weren't diverse — chiefly affluent white men — nor democratic, and they had the advantage of more rapid population and economic growth than exists today. Those groups got things done, however.

Their decline, essayist Thomas Edsall wrote in the New York Times last month, has been particularly hurtful in cities such as St. Louis, Baltimore and Cleveland. One of the researchers he cited, demographer Aaron Renn, wrote in Governing magazine in August that civic leadership culture in many cities has turned "diffuse, bureaucratic, highly risk-averse, and with limited capacity to address major challenges."

One reason for the change, Edsall wrote, is the wave of corporate acquisitions that reduced the number of "big anchor" companies in cities. That's where the Twin Cities and Minnesota look different.